Good mornin to you, and thank you for sharing some of your valuable time with me.
This mornin I was reading Psalm 47, and a thought occurred to me that I want to pass along before it fades from my memory.

Psalm 47

1 “To the chief Musician, A Psalm for the sons of Korah. O clap your hands, all ye people; shout unto God with the voice of triumph.

2 For the LORD most high is terrible; he is a great King over all the earth.

3 He shall subdue the people under us, and the nations under our feet.

4 He shall choose our inheritance for us, the excellency of Jacob whom he loved. Selah. ”

(Here’s a little bit of Romans 9 to correlate with Psalm 47)

Romans 9

10 “And not only this; but when Rebecca also had conceived by one, even by our father Isaac;

11 (For the children being not yet born, neither having done any good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election might stand, not of works, but of him that calleth;)

12 It was said unto her, The elder shall serve the younger.

13 As it is written, Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated.

14 What shall we say then? Is there unrighteousness with God? God forbid.

15 For he saith to Moses, I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I will have compassion.

16 So then it is not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that sheweth mercy.


As I read Psalm 47. 4, I thought of the hypocrisy of “dispensationalism.”

What am I talking about?

I’m talking about dispensationalism heartily embraces God’s sovereign election in God choosing national Israel as His chosen people.

But dispensationalism heartily rejects God’s sovereign election in God choosing you or I as one of His chosen people.

Why is that?

Does that sound a little fishy to you? (It does to me).

I also thought about Cyrus Scofield being funded by Jewish underwriters to publish his reference bible at Oxford university press in England, (which defined and promoted dispensationalism in its commentary). That reference bible being the very instrument that’s primarily responsible for dispensationalism getting the traction that would propel it to the mainstream-status that it enjoys today. (If you want proof, then do an internet search by pasting the following words in the search bar: “Scofield reference bible, Oxford university press, Rothchild”).

And I thought about it all as a possible ploy of Jews to convince Gentiles to further the notion that … we (the Jews) are God’s chosen people, but you aren’t. And we’re even going to convince you to spread that message for us.

And baptists & pentecostals have done exactly that, (which of course delights Zionists).

However, if you’ll think about why the Jews hate Jesus, this agenda that I speak of will be even clearer to you.

It’s because Jesus (and John the Baptist) made it clear to the Jews that they weren’t God’s children because of their genealogy from Abraham, or by their lawkeeping (morality). But rather, they would have to believe on Jesus to be God’s people.

Their heritage counts for nothing in terms of righteousness.

And because of their continued rejection & rebellion against God and His prophets, Jesus told them that their house was left unto them desolate, (in Matthew 23.38). And they’ve been fuming about that ever since.

That’s something to think about isn’t it?

This post isn’t a rejection of any people, it’s merely an inspection of the false doctrine known as “dispensationalism.”


It’s also helpful to understand that national Israel was always a shadow of the true Israel of God.


All glory to the risen Lord Jesus Christ, and no glory to us whatsoever.